Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-40250: Critical Fix in Linux Kernel Prevents mlx5 Driver Crash

Overview

CVE-2025-40250 addresses a vulnerability in the Linux kernel’s `mlx5` driver, specifically related to interrupt request (IRQ) allocation. When the system fails to allocate an IRQ vector during the `mlx5_irq_alloc()` function, improper cleanup could lead to the freeing of the entire rmap (resource map), resulting in a kernel crash. This issue is observed when both `fwctl` and `rds` configurations are enabled.

Technical Details

The root cause of the vulnerability lies in the incorrect cleanup procedure executed after a failed `request_irq()` call within the `mlx5_irq_alloc()` function. Instead of only removing the newly added (and failed) IRQ mapping, the entire rmap was inadvertently freed. Subsequent attempts by other threads to access this freed memory resulted in a general protection fault and a system crash.

The fix implemented in the kernel addresses this by modifying the cleanup process to remove only the specific IRQ mapping that was being added when the `request_irq()` call failed. This targeted cleanup ensures that other valid mappings are not affected, preventing the crash.

The following call trace illustrates the potential crash scenario:

mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: Successfully registered panic handler for port 1
mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 66740): Failed to
request irq. err = -28
infiniband mlx5_0: mlx5_ib_test_wc:290:(pid 66740): Error -28 while
trying to test write-combining support
mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: Successfully unregistered panic handler for port 1
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: Successfully registered panic handler for port 1
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 66740): Failed to
request irq. err = -28
infiniband mlx5_0: mlx5_ib_test_wc:290:(pid 66740): Error -28 while
trying to test write-combining support
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: Successfully unregistered panic handler for port 1
mlx5_core 0000:03:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 28895): Failed to
request irq. err = -28
mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 28895): Failed to
request irq. err = -28
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
0xe277a58fde16f291: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI

RIP: 0010:free_irq_cpu_rmap+0x23/0x7d
Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2f9
   ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2f9
   ? mlx5_irq_alloc.cold+0x5d/0xf3 [mlx5_core]
   ? __die_body.cold+0x8/0xa
   ? die_addr+0x39/0x53
   ? exc_general_protection+0x1c4/0x3e9
   ? dev_vprintk_emit+0x5f/0x90
   ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x27
   ? free_irq_cpu_rmap+0x23/0x7d
   mlx5_irq_alloc.cold+0x5d/0xf3 [mlx5_core]
   irq_pool_request_vector+0x7d/0x90 [mlx5_core]
   mlx5_irq_request+0x2e/0xe0 [mlx5_core]
   mlx5_irq_request_vector+0xad/0xf7 [mlx5_core]
   comp_irq_request_pci+0x64/0xf0 [mlx5_core]
   create_comp_eq+0x71/0x385 [mlx5_core]
   ? mlx5e_open_xdpsq+0x11c/0x230 [mlx5_core]
   mlx5_comp_eqn_get+0x72/0x90 [mlx5_core]
   ? xas_load+0x8/0x91
   mlx5_comp_irqn_get+0x40/0x90 [mlx5_core]
   mlx5e_open_channel+0x7d/0x3c7 [mlx5_core]
   mlx5e_open_channels+0xad/0x250 [mlx5_core]
   mlx5e_open_locked+0x3e/0x110 [mlx5_core]
   mlx5e_open+0x23/0x70 [mlx5_core]
   __dev_open+0xf1/0x1a5
   __dev_change_flags+0x1e1/0x249
   dev_change_flags+0x21/0x5c
   do_setlink+0x28b/0xcc4
   ? __nla_parse+0x22/0x3d
   ? inet6_validate_link_af+0x6b/0x108
   ? cpumask_next+0x1f/0x35
   ? __snmp6_fill_stats64.constprop.0+0x66/0x107
   ? __nla_validate_parse+0x48/0x1e6
   __rtnl_newlink+0x5ff/0xa57
   ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x164/0x2ce
   rtnl_newlink+0x44/0x6e
   rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2bb/0x362
   ? __netlink_sendskb+0x4c/0x6c
   ? netlink_unicast+0x28f/0x2ce
   ? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x150/0x146
   netlink_rcv_skb+0x5f/0x112
   netlink_unicast+0x213/0x2ce
   netlink_sendmsg+0x24f/0x4d9
   __sock_sendmsg+0x65/0x6a
   ____sys_sendmsg+0x28f/0x2c9
   ? import_iovec+0x17/0x2b
   ___sys_sendmsg+0x97/0xe0
   __sys_sendmsg+0x81/0xd8
   do_syscall_64+0x35/0x87
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x0
RIP: 0033:0x7fc328603727
Code: c3 66 90 41 54 41 89 d4 55 48 89 f5 53 89 fb 48 83 ec 10 e8 0b ed
ff ff 44 89 e2 48 89 ee 89 df 41 89 c0 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00
f0 ff ff 77 35 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 44 ed ff ff 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffe8eb3f1a0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007fc328603727
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffe8eb3f1f0 RDI: 000000000000000d
RBP: 00007ffe8eb3f1f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00000000000
---truncated---
        

CVSS Analysis

Due to the potential for a kernel crash leading to a denial of service, this vulnerability is considered to have a high impact. However, a specific CVSS score has not been assigned at this time. Factors influencing the severity include the requirement for specific configurations (`fwctl` and `rds` enabled) to trigger the vulnerability and the reliance on the system exhausting IRQ vectors.

Possible Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2025-40250 is a denial-of-service condition resulting from a kernel crash. This can lead to:

  • System unavailability
  • Data loss (if the system is in the process of writing data to disk)
  • Interruption of critical services

Mitigation and Patch Steps

The vulnerability is resolved by applying the patch provided by the Linux kernel developers. Users are strongly advised to update their kernels to a version containing the fix. The specific commits addressing this issue are listed in the References section below.

To mitigate the risk before applying the patch, consider the following:

  • Reducing the number of devices or services that require IRQ allocation may lower the chance of exhausting IRQ vectors, though this may impact functionality.
  • Monitoring system logs for warnings related to IRQ allocation failures.

References

Cybersecurity specialist and founder of Gowri Shankar Infosec - a professional blog dedicated to sharing actionable insights on cybersecurity, data protection, server administration, and compliance frameworks including SOC 2, PCI DSS, and GDPR.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *